 Open Access
 Total Downloads : 19
 Authors : M.P. Singh, Amandeep Sharma, Bhajan Singh, B.S. Sandhu
 Paper ID : IJERTCONV1IS01021
 Volume & Issue : AMRP – 2013 (Volume 1 – Issue 01)
 Published (First Online): 30072018
 ISSN (Online) : 22780181
 Publisher Name : IJERT
 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Experimental measurement of Rayleigh to Compton crosssection ratio for 279 keV gamma photons
M.P. Singp, Amandeep Sharma2, Bhajan Singp, B.S. Sandhu1,*
1Department of Physics, Punjabi University Patiala147002
2Department of Math. Stat. & Physics, Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana141004
*Email: balvir@ pbi.ac.in
Abstract
The present work involves measurement of Rayleigh to Compton scattering crosssection ratio of elements in the range 13 Z 79 for 279 keV incident gamma photons. An HPGe gamma detector, placed at 50 to the incident beam, detects gamma photons scattered from the target under investigation. The intensities of Rayleigh and Compton scattered peaks observed in the recorded spectra, and corrected for photopeak efficiency of gamma detector and absorption of photons in the target and air column present between the target and detector, along with the other required parameters provides differential crosssections ratio for Rayleigh to Compton scattering. The measured values of crosssection ratio are found to agree with existing theories for low Z elements, but deviate for high Z elements.

Introduction
Rayleigh (coherent) scattering results in scattering of gamma photon without any change in energy, and is predominant at low incident photon energies, small scattering angles and high atomic number elements. The atomic Compton (incoherent) scattering results in degradation of gamma photon energy, and can be calculated with the incoherent scattering function modification to KleinNishina formula for Compton scattering. Rayleigh to Compton scattering ratio, R, has a power relation to Z in the region of elemental interest and this power dependence is based upon the ratio F2/S, with F(q,Z) being the form factor and
S(q,Z) is the incoherent scattering function. Hubbell et al. [1] have provided theoretical model for the calculation of Rayleigh to Compton crosssection ratio from the parameters F(q, Z) and S(q, Z).
Various theories have been developed to calculate atomic form factor based on nonrelativistic form factor [1], relativistic form factor [2], modified relativistic form factor

and Smatrix theory [4]. According to these theories, the atomic form factor, F(q, Z), is the Fourier transform of atomic charge distribution and can be evaluated by different wave functions. Icelli and Erzeneoglu [5] have measured the ratio of differential crosssections for coherent and Compton scattering of 59.54 keV at scattering angles of 55 and 115 for Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ag, Sn, Ta, Au and Pb targets using Ge(Li) detector. More recently, we [6] have determined coherent to incoherent scattering cross section
ratio of elements for 145 keV gamma photons. An accurate determination of ratios of coherent to incoherent scattering for different elements is important because of their wide use in the fields of atomic and radiation physics, and non destructive elemental analysis of materials. There have been various investigations on coherent (Rayleigh) to incoherent (Compton) scattering ratio method. This intensity ratio method has been quite successful in various fundamental and medical applications of gamma radiations. Our group has successfully used this ratio technique for non destructive evaluation of scientific and biological samples, measurements of mandibular bone density and pulmonary edema etc. [7].
The knowledge of coherent to incoherent scattering crosssection ratio is useful in the calculations of radiation attenuation, reactor shielding, industrial applications and also in the field of medical sciences in a number of ways. In the present experiment, Rayleigh to Compton scattering crosssection ratio values are measured for elements in the range, 13 Z 79, for 279 keV incident gamma photons. The measured results are compared with various existing
A
theories available in literature (corresponding to 9.510 o 1
photon momentum transfer).


Experimental setup and Method of Measurements
The principle of present measurements is to observe the intensities of Rayleigh and Compton scattered gamma photons at a particular scattering angle. The measurements are performed using 203Hg (279 keV) radioactive source strength of activity 0.925 GBq, which is placed at the end of a cylindrical cavity of depth 20 mm and diameter 11 mm fabricated in a lead cube having each side 160 mm (Fig. 1). An aluminium hollow sleeve of internal diameter 12 mm, fitted in the centre of a rectangular block of lead having dimensions 80 mm 80 mm 15 mm, is placed coaxially adjacent to the cavity to obtain a narrow beam of photons. The distance of thin target under study from the source collimator (radius 3 mm) is kept as 100 mm. The source target assembly is aligned in such a way that the
Fig.1: Experimental setup
incident photon beam is confined to the target element. The intense collimated beam of gamma photons from the radioactive source is made to impinge on a given target, which is placed symmetrically with respect to incident and finally scattered directions. An HPGe solidstate gamma detector of dimensions 56.4 mm diameter and 29.5 mm length placed at scattering angle of 50 detects radiations scattered from the target. The field of view of the HPGe detector is confined to target only. The axes of source collimator, gamma detector and detector collimator pass through centre of the target. The distance between target under study and detector collimator (radius 4 mm) is kept 100 mm, so the angular spread about median ray in direction of gamma detector is 2.9. The HPGe detector is properly shielded by

Results and Discussion
In the present experiment, the intensity ratio of Rayleigh to Compton scattered peaks originating from interactions of primary gamma flux with the element, for a fixed geometrical sourcetargetdetector arrangement (Fig.1) and incident gamma photon energy, have been measured. In the first step, the properly shielded HPGe gamma ray detector is placed at the desired angular position ( = 50) relative to the primary incident gamma beam. The spectrometer is calibrated using standard calibration gammasources of known energy. Measurements are then carried out by placing thin targets of known atomic number (13 Z 79) and thickness (40500 mgcm2) in the primary incident gamma beam. The following procedure is adopted for the present measurements.

The targetin scattered spectra are recorded for a period of 10 ks by placing each of the targets (elements) in the primary gamma beam.

The background is recorded after removing the target out of the primary beam to permit registration of events due to cosmic rays and to any other process independent of target.
The present measurements for different elements are performed in the above stated sequence to minimize the effect of any possible drift in the system. The subtraction of events recorded under condition (ii), from those under condition (i) results in events originating from interaction of primary gamma rays in the given target. A typical scattered spectra, corrected for background events, originating from gold and brass targets is shown in Fig. 2. The spread in observed Compton peak is caused by finite angular aperture of the source and the detector collimators and the Doppler
3
a cylindrical lead shielding having inner side covered with 2mm thick iron and 1mm thick aluminium, with iron facing lead to absorb K Xrays emitted by lead shielding. It has been checked that radiations scattered from sorce collimator opening do not reach directly to the active volume of HPGe detector. In the present measurements, Canberra HPGe detector and electronic modules (power supply and amplifier) are used. The experimental data are accumulated on a PC based ORTEC Mastreo32 Multi channel analyser.
The formula used for the measurement of ratio of Rayleigh to Compton scattering crosssections [6] is given as:
x10
6
5
Number of counts
4
3
2
1
0
Compton peak
Rayleigh peak
Au
Brass
dR () NR NE C C C
(1)
150 200 250 300 350
Energy (keV)
dC () NC NA R R R
where N /N is the ratio of the number of counts under
Fig. 2: Typical observed spectra at 50o from gold and brass
R C
Rayleigh and Compton scattered peaks, respectively; NE/NA is the ratio of number of electrons and atoms per unit volume in the target; C/R is the ratio of selfabsorption correction factor in the target for Compton and Rayleigh scattered energies; c/R is the ratio of absorption of Compton scattered and Rayleigh scattered gamma rays in air, and c/R is the ratio of the photopeak efficiency of the HPGe detector for Compton and Rayleigh scattered energies.
targets for 279 keV incident photons
broadening of Compton peak in addition to inherent energy resolution of the HPGe detector. It has also been observed that Compton peak dominants the Rayleigh peak for low Z targets, but for higher atomic number element like Au (Fig.
2) the Rayleigh peak is dominant than Compton peak in the observed spectra.
The intensities under Rayleigh and Compton scattered peaks (Fig. 2) are deduced from the recorded scattered
spectra. These observed intensities are corrected for photo peak efficiency of the HPGe detector, absorption in air column present between target (element) and the detector, and selfabsorption in elements and the detector, and self absorption in the target, as per relation [6]:
experimental results of differential Rayleigh to Compton scattering crosssection ratio increases nonlinearly with the increase in atomic number in the range 13 Z 79, but are higher than the theoretical data due to all the theories. The deviation of experimental results increases very sharply for high atomic number materials. This may be due to low
Nactual
Nobs
a t
(2)
probability of Rayleigh scattering process and high probability of Compton scattering process at high incident energy and also binding effects of the inner shell electrons. It also confirms that the binding effects of electrons are
where Nobs is the observed intensity under Rayleigh (or
Compton) peak; a is correction factor for absorption of photons in the air present between target and detector; a is selfabsorption correction factor for scattered photons in the target; and is photopeak efficiency of gamma detector for Rayleigh (or Compton) scattered photons.
The measured values of differential crosssection ratio for Rayleigh to Compton scattering, are given in column 2 of Table 1. The statistical error involved in the crosssection measurements ranges from 8 12%. The columns 2 to 5 of Table 1 provide the crosssection ratio values deduced from nonrelativistic form factor [1], relativistic form factor [2], modified relativistic form factor [3], and Smatrix theory

respectively.
Table1: Experimental and theoretical Rayleigh to Compton scattering cross section ratio as a function of atomic number at 279 keV at 50o
important in measurements of the Compton scattering differential crosssection especially at low scattering angles. The photopeak efficiency values are also measured experimentally using single energy sources of known source strength of 203Hg (279 keV) and 137Cs (662 keV). The experimental measured values of photopeak efficiency using single energy sources of 203Hg and 137Cs of known source strengths come to be 2.5% and 1.12%, respectively and are nearly in agreement with Canberra Germanium detector user's manual values of 2.4% and 1.10% respectively. The targets used in the present experiments are thin, with t 1, here is the linear attenuation coefficient and t is the thickness of the target under study. The contribution of events resulting from Bremsstrahlung originating from slowing down of photoelectrons and Compton recoil electrons is estimated on the basis of an experimental technique suggested by Sandhu et al [8], and is
Element (Atomic number)
Present results (Expt.)
Theory [1] (NRFF)
Theory [2] (RFF)
Theory [3] (MRFF)
Theory [4]
(SMatrix)
Al (13)
0.0415
Â± 0.0053
2 x 105
1.9 x 105
1.7 x 105
1.9 x 105
Cu (29)
0.0560
Â± 0.0064
0.0092
0.010
0.0087
0.0077
Ag (47)
0.114
Â± 0.0093
0.026
0.029
0.023
0.024
Gd (64)
0.1723
Â± 0.0345
0.039
0.048
0.034
0.038
Au (79)
0.5655
Â± 0.0487
0.059
0.092
0.061
0.093
0.6 Incident energy = 279 keV Scattering angle = 50o
Rayleigh to Compton crosssection ratio
0.5 — Experimental data
Best fitted line
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
RFF
NRFF
SM MFF
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Atomic number Z
Fig
3: Variation of Rayleigh to Compton scattering crosssection ratio as a function of atomic number
Figure 3 shows the plot of Rayleigh to Compton cross section ratio as a function of Znumber of the target. It is observed that as the atomic number increases, the value of Rayleigh to Compton scattering crosssection ratio increases nonlinearly and the trend is similar to that predicted by various theoretical models [14]. The measured differential crosssection values for Rayleigh to Compton ratio are compared with theoretical values calculated by employing nonrelativistic form factor, relativistic form factor, modified relativistic form factor and Smatrix theory. At incident energy of 279 keV and scattering angle of 50o, our
found to be less than 1% under the present experimental conditions.
A
These results constitute the first experimental report of ratios of coherent to incoherent scattering crosssections, corresponding to 9.510 o 1 photon momentum transfer for the elements studied, as there are no earlier reports in the literature. The measurements of these ratios are also important because by comparison with theoretical predictions based on atomic models, there is the possibility of testing the validity of these models. One of the major
advantages of the method is that by taking the ratio of the coherent (Rayleigh) to incoherent (Compton) scattered photons, a number of parameters such as absolute source strength, solid angles subtended by source and the detector at the target, etc. are eliminated in the expression of R/C ratio, otherwise determination of these parameters introduce large amount of error in the measured results. As measurement of differential scattering cross sections is useful in the studies of radiation attenuation, transport and energy deposition and plays an important role in medical physics, reactor shielding, industrial radiography in addition to crystallography. So, there is need to explore this ratio method to provide plots for element crosssection ratio versus wide range of scattering angle to determine the optimum angular position while using this technique for 79 keV.


References

J H Hubbell, W J Veigele, E H Briggs, R T Brown, D T Cromer and R J Howertan, Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions and photon scattering cross sections, J Phys Chem Ref Data, AIP, 4 (1975) 471538.

J H Hubbell and I Overbro, Relativistic atomic form factors and photon coherent scattering cross sections J Phys Chem Ref Data, AIP, 8 (1979) 69107.

D Schaupp, M Schumacher, F Smend, P Rullhusen and J H Hubbell, Small angle Rayleigh scattering of photons at high energies: Tabulations of Relativistic HFS modified atomic form factors J Phys Chem Ref Data, AIP,12 (1983) 467513.

B K Chatterjee and S C Roy, Tables of elastic scattering cross sections of photons in the energy range 501500 keV for all elements in the range 13 Z 104, J Phys Chem Ref Data, AIP, 27 (1998) 10111216.

O Icelli and S Erzeneoglu, Experimental study on ratios of coherent scattering to Compton scattering for elements with atomic numbers 26<Z<82 in 59.5 keV for 55Â° and 115Â° Spectrochimica Act. B, Elsevier, 57 (2002) 13171323.

M P Singh, Amandeep Sharma, Bhajan Singh, B S Sandhu, An experimental study on crosssection ratio of coherent to incoherent scattering for 145 keV incident gamma photons, Radiation Measurements, Elsevier, 59 (2013) 3036.

Amandeep Sharma, Bhajan Singh and B S Sandhu, A non destructive scattering technique for investigation of pulmonary edema, Appl. Radiat. Isot., Elsevier, 70 (2012) 112118.

B S Sandhu, R Dewan, M B Saddi, B Singh and B S Ghumman, Experimental study of angular dependence in double photon Compton scattering, Nucl. Instr. & Meth. B., Elsevier, 168 (2000) 329336.